Supermassive black hole caught hiding in a ring of cosmic dust

© ESO

The European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope Interferometer (ESO’s VLTI) has observed a cloud of cosmic dust at the centre of the galaxy Messier 77 that is hiding a supermassive black hole. The findings have confirmed predictions made around 30 years ago and are giving astronomers new insight into “active galactic nuclei”, some of the brightest and most enigmatic objects in the universe.

Active galactic nuclei (AGNs) are extremely energetic sources powered by supermassive black holes and found at the centre of some galaxies. These black holes feed on large volumes of cosmic dust and gas. Before it is eaten up, this material spirals towards the black hole and huge amounts of energy are released in the process, often outshining all the stars in the galaxy.

Astronomers have been curious about AGNs ever since they first spotted these bright objects in the 1950s. Now, thanks to ESO’s VLTI, a team of researchers, led by Violeta Gámez Rosas from Leiden University in the Netherlands, have taken a key step towards understanding how they work and what they look like up close.

Read more here!

ELI ERIC is looking for a Director of Science

The Extreme Light Infrastructure (ELI) ERIC is the leading European science facility for physical sciences based on laser sources. As an international user facility, ELI has the broadest portfolio of scientific lasers in the world, from highintensity to ultrashort pulse high repetition rate lasers.

The ELI ERIC is offering an exceptional opportunity for a worldleading, innovative and recognised scientist to take up the role of Director of Science (DoS). Reporting to the Director General, the DoS will provide strategic leadership, direction and management for ELI ERIC, as well as being a part of the ELI Management Board. The DoS will represent and serve as the leading scientific spokesperson for ELI ERIC.

The DoS will develop and coordinate the scientific user programme with the ELI Facilities. In consultation with the funding agencies, the ELI ERIC International Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee (ISTAC), and the user community, the DoS will define the scope and aims of the programme, as well as the process for the scientific evaluation of its performance.

A detailed description about the Role and the requirements, can be found here!

Candidates should send a letter of interest, including a concise description of experience relevant to the position, as well as their CV and at least two references to jobs@elilaser.eu. Position is open until filled.

The selection committee will begin evaluating qualified candidates in March 2022.

Horizon Europe – The First assessment

© SCIENCE | BUSINESS

As the first year of Horizon Europe draws to a close, Science|Business gathered feedback on the new €95.5 R&D programme from an online survey and meetings with its member-organisations. The result: recommendations on how to make the next six years of Horizon Europe even better.

The reviews are mixed, but most believe the programme will have a big impact on the European R&D landscape. Almost half of the survey respondents say it’s an improvement compared with Horizon 2020. But once the talk turns to paperwork, application forms and the unpredictable participants portal, the grumbling begins. Some say the calls are difficult to interpret, and impact-driven to a point where no one project can meet all the demands.

Many also struggle with understanding the policy context in which some of the calls are grounded. Next year, applicants hope for a better balance of project impacts and better supporting documentation to make the demands clearer.

Click here to check the complete Science Business Horizon Europe Assessment Report!

The Big Science Business Forum 2022 is revving up its engines!

The Big Science Business Forum 2022 is revving up its engines! On 4-7 October 2022, the eleven most prominent Big Science research facilities in the areas of astrophysics, space, synchrotrons and high-energy accelerators and fusion will be present in Granada for the second edition of the Big Science Business Forum to present to industry their procurement plans for the period 2022-2026 worth more than 37 billion euros.

BSBF2022 is organised by CDTI, E.P.E, the Spanish innovation agency depending on the Ministry of Science and Innovation, with the support of eleven full member Big Science facilities: the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), the European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), the European Space Agency (ESA), the European Southern Observatory (ESO), the European Spallation Source (ESS), the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF), the European X-Ray Free Electron Laser (European XFEL), the Facility for Antriproton and Ion Reseach in Europe (FAIR), Fusion for Energy (F4E) representing the ITER project, the Institut Laue-Langevin (ILL) and the Square Kilometre Array Observatory (SKAO).

More than 1000 delegates from 500 companies and organisations across Europe are estimated to take part in BSBF2022. The congress is structured in parallel sessions which will cover ten technological areas (electronics, instruments, manufacturing techniques, control systems, information and communication technologies, cryogenics and vacuum, etc.) as well as several cross-cutting topics such as IFMIF-DONES or research infrastructures in Horizon Europe.

The early bird registration deadline is 30 April, 2022, register now and benefit from the discount!

Read more here

ICRI 2022: International conference on research infrastructures

ICRI 2022 will be hosted by the Czech Presidency of the EU, in Brno on 19-21 October 2022.

Every two years since 2012, ICRI has hosted about 500 delegates, who discuss topics concerning research infrastructures on the international level. The venue alternates between the EU and third countries, and the event is organised jointly by the European Commission and the host country. It will provide a platform for high-level debates of research infrastructure policymakers, operators and users, and research stakeholders from around the world to address the most pressing research infrastructure topics.

This edition of the ICRI will focus on the socioeconomic benefits and social responsibility of research infrastructures in the context of international cooperation and on ways of developing an integrated infrastructure ecosystem.

Registration will open in late spring!

Read more here

International Day of Women and Girls in Science: an interview with Sonia Utermann!

“The only strategy I have yet discovered that really helps is ‘paying forward’. ‘Paying forward’ means women supporting women in small but meaningful ways. A little bit of solidarity goes a long way”. 

To mark International Day of Women and Girls in Science, which is celebrated on 11 February 2022, ENRIITC is publishing something extra special: an interview with Sonia Utermann!

In addition to being an active member of the ENRIITC community since the beginning, Sonia is part of the Big Science Business Forum (BSBF) organising committee. We are thrilled to see that, for the first time, the theme “Women in big science” will be covered in a dedicated webinar that is scheduled for 11 February 2022 (registration open here).

In this ENRIITC interview, Sonia shares her personal experience being a woman working in science. We hope that it resonates with other women who are already working, or considering working, in science.


INTERVIEW

Can you tell us a bit about yourself? What’s your name, nationality and job role?

Thank you for inviting me to this interview. I’m Sonia Utermann, and I work in project management at an internationally owned particle accelerator. I don’t think nationality should matter, especially not in science; it’s just another barrier.

Can you briefly outline your educational and academic background?

I never planned to become a physicist. I went to university and studied physics because it interested me. I just kept on doing degrees in physics until I got my Ph.D. One day I looked back and realised that I was probably a physicist, despite what the impostor syndrome (so familiar to women in academia) said. In 2020, I got my MBA in engineering management.

Can you tell us about a challenge you’ve faced in your career, and how you overcame it?

It feels like it’s all been a challenge, to be honest! My favourite challenges are the ones I set myself, though.

What’s your role in BSBF and when did you first get involved with them?

I first came across BSBF in 2018. I had been working at the Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe (FAIR) for six months by then, and I knew enough about the magnitude of the challenges of Big Science procurement to recognise that this event was not to be missed. I contacted the organisers right away. With just three weeks to go before BSBF 2018, the organisers welcomed FAIR on board as an associated member. I can’t imagine the trouble they took to make that possible, but I am grateful to this day. Now FAIR is a full member and co-organiser of the BSBF 2022 in Granada.

I coordinate the FAIR contribution and represent FAIR on the international organising committee. It’s intimidating to be surrounded by such accomplished people in the committee, but I am learning a lot from them. It’s true that you grow with your challenges.

To date, what career project/activity/outcome are you most proud of?

I got my current job because of a hobby I took up during a period of unemployment. Bored and frustrated of being jobless, I signed up for French evening classes and I really threw myself into it; I took exams and everything. It turned out to be the qualification that tipped the balance in my favour. That experience has really impressed on me the importance of pursuing any interest, no matter whether it is “useful”. I’m proud of that realisation. Now I pursue my interests wholeheartedly and unapologetically.

In your experience, do you think the environment for and role of women in science has changed in recent years? If yes, in what ways?

I can’t really answer this, because I have changed, too. Are male colleagues more likely to listen to me because the culture has changed, or have I just become louder/older/fatter/less likely to care if they listen or not? However, I feel confident in saying that not nearly enough has changed. We have to keep pushing, and we have to continue to support one another.

As a successful woman in the generally male-dominated field, have you experienced adversaries due to do your gender? How did you overcome these situations?

Yes, I have always experienced aggression and discrimination. It continues to this day, and it still hurts. The only strategy I have yet discovered that really helps is “paying forward”. “Paying forward” means women supporting women in small but meaningful ways, for example with an invitation to give a talk, with a link to a job vacancy or a grant, through introductions, recommendations or a signal boost when she posts a career success on LinkedIn. A little bit of solidarity goes a long way.

What would it surprise people to know about you?

I can recognise the calls of over 100 European songbirds!

What further changes would you like to see with regards to the role of women in science in the years ahead?

I would like to see gender-based and all other discrimination taken seriously as the catastrophe it is for science and the world. It is not a niche problem. How should we go about dismantling it? Typical scientist answer: that’s not my field! There are plenty of brilliant researchers – many of them women and/or people of colour – who have addressed this question. We should heed their advice.

What advice would you give to young women interested in pursuing a career in science? It can also be a motivational quote for them!

Those young women are brighter and more talented than I will ever be. They don’t need my advice! However, I’m going to take the liberty of addressing the boys and men who are the peers and bosses of those young women. As peers and mentors, you can support girls and women when we set ourselves ambitious challenges. Don’t steal our thunder. Instead, listen to us; support us when we are interrupted and belittled in meetings; give us credit, promotions and pay bonuses for our work. Cite our work. When another man takes our voice, be the one to give it back.

 


A huge thanks to Sonia for taking the time to share with the ENRIITC network her experiences, and a big congrats as well for the recent publication of her MBA Engineering Thesis (2021) titled “Fostering Innovation through Big Science Procurement.”

ENRIITC is proud and grateful to all the members, partners and collaborators who continuously bring positive contributions to our project.

It is our hope that in the coming years the Big Science industry will see more women working at all levels. As Ursula von der Leyen stated during her speech on gender diversity earlier this year: Too often, when looking at top positions, men say that it is hard to find women with the right profile. Well, if you are seriously looking for them, you will find them.”

 

Member states break EIC work programme deadlock

© Goda Naujokaitytė | Science Business

EU member states have voted to break the political deadlock that has been holding back the European Innovation Council’s (EIC’s) 2022 work programme.

That means details of programme should be published by 8 February, allowing hundreds of tech companies to apply for capital they need to grow in the EU and global markets.

Start-ups and innovators have been waiting for the EU’s new innovation fund to kick off for the year. The first calls were expected to launch in January but the infighting over the work programme derailed the plans. The deadlock has also affected companies promised equity funding in 2021, which are also waiting for the capital to start flowing.

The delay was a result of political disagreements about the direction of the EIC and its big equity investment fund.

The hold-up involved a dispute over how to manage the fund. Problems started, sources involved in the discussions said, when the European Commission’s directorate general for budget proposed switching the Commission-run EIC Equity Fund from direct to indirect management, due to concerns about the risks attached to the Commission making equity investments.

Read more here

#ENRIITCyourCoffee S4 E8 on EMPHASIS and plant phenotyping for innovation

Welcome to the recap of #ENRIITCyourCoffee season 4 episode 8. Today we are venturing somewhat away from particle accelerators and synchrotrons instead into the flora. This episode was hosted by a familiar ENRIITCer Nikolaj Zangenberg from the Danish Technological Institute (DTI) and we had the pleasure to hear from Sven Fahrner, Manager & Business Planner at EMPHASIS, and Tony Pridmore, Professor of Computer Science at the University of Nottingham and Director of the UK Plant Phenotyping Network, PhenomUK.

Sven Fahrner started by summarising EMPHASIS with two terms: food security and climate change. EMPHASIS is approaching these huge topics from the focal point of plant phenotyping. What is phenotyping, you might ask? It is the dynamic interaction between the genetic code of the plant and the environmental impact on the plant.

A handy summarising image from the presentation can be found below. Download the full presentation here.

Sven points out that EMPHASIS has a wide range of both facilities and stakeholders with benefactors, given that they dig deep into plant performance, biomass production and overall influencing sustainable production. Sven will be discussing more the Data Industry group since that is the group that is most involved in the EMPHASIS Innovation Pilot.

Regarding facilities, EMPHASIS covers multiple climate zones and levels of facilities.

See the map in the video at 04:33. If you want to participate in EMPHASIS then please see their website here.

After a great intro to EMPHASIS, it was time for Tony Pridmore to elaborate on the Innovation Pilots. He elaborated that they see EMPHASIS as a technology broker between infrastructure operators and the technology developers and suppliers. The goal is to bring the right people together and foster an innovative environment.

The first steps have been to engage the key people to gather a community and then select a more active member to form an innovation board. This is the moment where Tony would like to use the collective knowledge from our audience and help them on the abstract task of community building.

Further Tony explained the next steps of providing innovation services to industry and academic developers. Some are more confident and some are expressed by their users. See the key topics explained by Tony in the video at 14:51.

Lastly, the EMPHASIS team is asking for help on engaging developers and our audience chipped in. View the video from 20:28.

 

#ENRIITCyourCoffee S4 E6 on TechConnect Europe and the Big Science Facilities Summit

Welcome to the recap of #ENRIITCyourCoffee season 4 episode 6 on TechConnect Europe presented to you by Dalia Yablon, Senior Advisor at TechConnect. ENRIITC is an associated partner of TechConnect and we help the organising committee set up activities. TechConnect was also the place for an ENRIITC physical meetup, that you can read more about here.

Dalia starts off by introducing the innovation-focused event series originating from the United States. TechConnect is a research and innovation event and a media leader with more than 20 years of experience connecting emerging technologies with unique funding and partnership opportunities. TechConnect Europe (TCE) is the inaugural European event in the line of TechConnect events. While 2021 saw the 24th TechConnect in the US, this was the first in Europe on 15-17 November 2021.

TechConnect is a unique meeting designed to accelerate the commercialisation of innovations out of labs into industry.

Dalia expands on the early days of TechConnect in the 1990’ when it was more nanotech focused since the founders – Matt Louden and Bart Romanowitz – were heavily involved in nanotech research and tried to get a forum for people engaged in that field of research. In general, TechConnect consists of 2 parts: the technical and the innovation spotlight section of the event.

1. The technical program for researchers to present their more applied work. This year the technical program has three main focus points:

  • Advanced materials
  • Biotech
  • Energy

2. Innovation spotlight (more thematic i.e advanced materials etc) where corporate or national labs have an overview of what they are looking for and start-ups or academic groups can pitch to them and everyone gets some short feedback.

The technical programme and innovation spotlight run in parallel and there is a lot of crossover and synergy between the two tracks.

The Big Science Facility Summit is an addition to the TechConnect event, which is done in every few years in the United States and the organisers decided to add that to the inaugural European event. The focus there is on the keynotes and Dalia was excited about bringing the whole innovation pipeline together in the workshops organised on site.

Listen to Dalia elaborate on the workshop schedule on the recording starting at 09:15.

Read more about #ENRIITCyourCoffee here.

Watch the recording below.

Communication guidelines for European research infrastructures: engaging with stakeholders in African countries

©  RI-VIS

This guideline document aims to provide European research infrastructure (EU RI) Communication Officers and other RI stakeholders with tools and recommendations to develop communication strategies to effectively engage with African stakeholders. It was designed to serve as a roadmap for developing context-appropriate communications with African stakeholders, in view of increasing RI visibility to target audiences and to make RIs more ‘findable’ on the web (and on their respective websites, with clear information regarding international collaboration or other opportunities).

Developed as part of the Horizon 2020-funded RI-VIS project (https://ri-vis.eu), the document is based on a survey, which was filled out by 22 respondents from Belgium, Botswana, Kenya, South Africa, Tanzania, The Gambia, Uganda, and Zambia. The main takeaways from the survey include the desire for collaborative approaches, including, but not limited to, staff exchanges and training, and the need to consider limited funding opportunities when reaching out to potential targets. It does not seem realistic to consider African stakeholders as another (future) potential market for EU RI services, whereby services would be paid for at full market cost; alternative, more collaborative approaches, based on local context and needs, may thus be more appropriate.

Some respondents indicated difficulty knowing how to reach out to EU RI stakeholders and ensure timely follow-up.This highlights the need for EU RIs to have appropriate outreach strategies in place, with pre-identified contact points and a process for responding to inquiries.

Check out the complete document here!